The
First Servile War was a slave rebellion on the island of Sicily during
the second century BC. The island had been recently seized from the
Carthaginians by Roman conquerers, and new Roman estate managers were
notably more brutal in their treatment of the slave labor force on the
island. The Romans also imported large numbers of slaves bought or
captured as prisoners of war elsewhere, swelling the population of
disatisfied laborers. The rebellion was led by Eunous, a Syrian prophet
and wonder-worker, and another slave named Kleon. They raised a slave
army of several thousand and won a series victories before the
rebellion was finally and ruthlessly crushed by a newly arrived Roman
army led by Publius Rupilius in 132. The first century Greek historian
Diodorus Siculus wrote an account of the rebellion which has since been
lost, but summaries and excerpts of his narrative from Photius,
the ninth-century patriarch of Constantinople, and the tenth century
Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus survive.
Diodorus Siculus’ Account of the First Servile War (c. 135–132 BC)
Constantine Porphyrogenitus, Excerpt
2 (1), pp. 302f. (25) Diodorus Siculus says that no civil conflict was
ever so great as that of the slaves which took place in Sicily. Many
cities suffered terrible catastrophes in the course of this conflict,
and countless men, women and children experienced the greatest
misfortunes, and there was a danger that the whole island might come
under the control of the runaways. The only standard they set
themselves for the exercise of their power was that it should cause the
maximum harm to the free population. For most people these occurrences
were surprising and unexpected; but for anyone able to judge things
realistically they didn’t appear to arise without due cause. (26)
Because of the extreme prosperity of the people who enjoyed the natural
products of this very great island, almost everyone as he got richer
adopted first a luxurious, and then an arrogant and provocative pattern
of behaviour. As a result of these developments, slaves were coming to
be treated worse and worse, and were correspondingly more and more
alienated from their owners. When a suitable opportunity occurred, this
hatred broke out into the open. Consequently, many tens of thousands of
slaves rallied together to destroy their masters without any need for
incitement. Something similar also happened in Asia Minor during these
years, when Aristonikos laid claim to a kingdom which didn’t belong to
him and the slaves cooperated with him because of the ill treatment
that they had received from their masters, involving many cities in
terrible disasters. (27) …that in the same way all the men who owned a
lot of land bought up entire consignments of slaves to work their
farms…some were bound with chains, some were worn out by the hard work
they were given to do; they branded all of them with humiliating
brand-marks. As a result such a huge number of slaves flooded the whole
of Sicily that those who heard it thought it exaggerated and
unbelievable. The Sicilians who controlled all this wealth were
competing in arrogance, greed and injustice with the Italians. Those
Italians who owned a lot of slaves had accustomed their herdsmen to
irresponsible behaviour to such an extent that instead of providing
them with rations they encouraged them to rob. (28) This freedom was
given to men who because of their physical power were able to put into
practice anything they planned to do, men who because of
underemployment and leisure could make the most of their opportunities,
men who because of their lack of food were forced into risky
undertakings; and this soon led to an increase in the crime-rate. They
started by killing people who were travelling alone or in pairs in
particularly out-of-the-way places. Then they got together in groups
and attacked the farms of the weak by night, plundering their property
and killing those who resisted. (29) They became more and more bold,
and Sicily was no longer passable for travellers at night. It ceased to
be safe for those who had been living in the countryside to stay there;
every place was affected by violence and robbery and murder of every
kind. But because the herdsmen were used to living out in the open and
were equipped like soldiers, they were (not surprisingly) full of
courage and arrogance. They carried around clubs and spears and hefty
sticks and wore the skins of wolves or wild boars, so their appearance
was frightening and in itself not much less than a provocation to
violence. (30) A pack of trusty hounds accompanied each of them, and
the great amount of milk and meat which was available for consumption
dehumanised their minds as well as their bodies. So the whole country
was, as it were, occupied by scattered groups of soldiers, since under
their owners’ maladministration these dangerous slaves had been armed.
(31) The governors did try to control the fury of the slaves, but
because they didn’t dare to punish them because of the power and
importance of their masters, they were forced to overlook the fact that
the province was being plundered. This was because most of the
landlords had the status of Roman equestrians, and since they provided
the juries when provincial governors were accused of anything, they
were greatly feared by those who held these offices.
Photius, Bibliotheca,
p. 384. (4) The slaves were exhausted by the hardships they had to put
up with, and humiliated by beatings which were often quite unjustified.
They could not take any more. They got together when they had the
chance and talked about revolting and in the end they put their plan
into effect. (5) Antigenes of Enna owned a house-slave who was a Syrian
by race, from Apamea. This man was something of a magician and
wonder-worker. He pretended that he could foretell the future by means
of commands that came to him from the gods when he was asleep, and
because he was so good at this he managed to deceive a lot of people.
He went on from there and didn’t just prophesy on the basis of dreams,
but even pretended to have visions of the gods while awake and hear
from them what was going to happen. (6) Of the many fantasies he
invented some happened to come true. Since no one refuted those that
didn’t, while those that did turn out true were widely acclaimed, his
reputation increased enormously. In the end he would produce fire and
flame from his mouth while in a trance, by means of a trick of some
sort, and in this way produce inspired utterances about the future. (7)
What he did was put some fire and the fuel needed to keep it going
inside a walnut or something similar which had had holes bored into it
at both ends; then he would put it into his mouth and breathe and thus
produce sparks or even a flame. Before the revolt he said that the
Syrian Goddess was appearing to him and promising him that he was going
to be a king. He insisted on repeating this not just to others but even
to his own master. (8) The thing was treated as a joke, and Antigenes,
bewitched by his marvellous trick, introduced Eunous to his dinner
guests (that was the wizard’s name) and asked him all about his kingdom
and what his policy would be towards each of the people present. He had
no hesitation in explaining the details, stating that he would have a
very moderate policy towards the owners of slaves and generally
producing an amazingly entertaining story, so that the guests were
amused and some of them would take considerable portions of food from
the table and give them to him, asking that when he became king he
should remember the favour they were doing him. (9) But indeed his
magic-working had reserved a genuine kingship for him in the stars, and
the favours received as a joke at these dinners were reciprocated under
conditions which were serious indeed. The insurrection as a whole began
like this.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 2 (1), p. 304…. (34) There was a citizen of Enna called
Damophilos who was both extremely wealthy and extremely arrogant. He
cultivated a huge area of land which he filled with herds of cattle
owned by him and competed with the Italians living in Sicily not only
as regards his luxurious lifestyle but also the number of his slaves
and the harshness and inhumanity with which he treated them. He would
proceed about the countryside accompanied by a retinue of expensive
horses and four-wheeled carts and a paramilitary escort formed by his
own slaves. In addition, he thought it very prestigious to have lots of
beautiful boys and a crowd of uneducated hangers-on. (35) Both at Enna
and in his country houses he insisted on displaying his great wealth of
embossed silverware and purple carpets, and served huge meals which
were provocative and more suitable for kings; in terms of the expense
and waste he surpassed the luxuriousness of Orientals. So did his
arrogance. Here was a man who was totally uneducated, in possession of
power without responsibility together with vast wealth, and it first
made him bored, then made him behave insolently towards others, and in
the end destroyed him and brought horrible disasters upon his country.
(36)
He bought large numbers of slaves and treated them in a humiliating
way, marking with branding irons the bodies of men who had been of free
birth in their own countries and experienced the misfortune of capture
in war and enslavement. He bound some of them with chains and threw
them into his prisons, and he appointed others as herdsmen without
providing them with appropriate clothes or rations. (37) Because of his
wilful and savage character, there wasn’t a single day on which this
same Damophilos didn’t torture some of his slaves without just cause.
His wife Metallis [sic; Photius calls her Megallis] took equal pleasure
in these insolent punishments and treated her maids and those slaves
who were under her jurisdiction with great brutality. The slaves
developed the feelings of wild beasts towards their masters as a result
of these humiliating punishments, and thought that nothing that could
happen to them would be worse than the evil state they were in.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 4, p. 384…. (38) that Damophilos of Enna once refused to accept
a request for clothes from some naked slaves who came up to him, but
replied, ‘Why ask me? The people who travel across the countryside
don’t go about naked—don’t they provide a ready source of cloaks for
those who need them?’ He ordered the petitioners to be tied to pillars
and beaten, and after this humiliation sent them away.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 3, pp. 206–7. (24b) The slaves got together to consider
rebellion and the murder of their master and mistress. They went to
Eunous, who lived nearby, and asked him whether their plan had the
approval of the gods, He made a show of being divinely inspired and
asked them why they had come, and pronounced that the gods would grant
them their revolt if they didn’t delay but put their plans into effect
immediately. For Fate had decreed that Enna, the citadel of the whole
island, should be their State. When they heard this they assumed that
the spirit world was behind them in their undertaking, and their
emotions were so intent on rebellion that nothing could delay their
plans. So they immediately set free those slaves who were chained up
and got together those of the others who were living nearby. About four
hundred of them assembled in a field near Enna. They made a solemn
agreement amongst themselves and exchanged oaths on the strength of
nocturnal sacrifices, and then armed themselves as well as the occasion
permitted. They all seized the most effective weapon of all, fury,
directed towards the destruction of the master and mistress who had
humiliated them. Eunous led them. Shouting to each other in
encouragement they broke into the city about the middle of the night
and killed many people.
Photius, Bibliotheca,
pp. 384–6. (11) Eunous was leading them and working the miracle of the
flames of fire to encourage them. They broke into the houses and
committed much bloodshed; not even babes in arms were spared— (12) they
tore them from the breast and dashed them against the ground. I can’t
say how they humiliated and outraged the women, even in the sight of
their husbands. A large number of slaves from inside the city joined
them; they first did their worst to their masters and then turned to
the slaughter of others. (13) When Eunous’ group heard that Damophilos
was staying in an orchard near the city together with his wife, they
sent some of their number to drag him and his wife away from there,
with their hands tied behind their backs; they had to put up with all
sorts of insults along the way.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 2 (1), p. 305…. (39) that in Sicily, Damophilos had a grown-up
but unmarried daughter, who had an extremely decent and humane
character. She always used to be kind and comfort anyone her parents
had whipped and help those slaves who had been chained up, and because
she was so nice, she was extraordinarily popular with everybody. At
this moment her previous kindness brought her unexpected help in the
shape of those she had been kind to: not only did no one dare to lay a
finger on the girl to humiliate her, but they all made sure that her
virginity would remain untouched. They selected some suitable men from
amongst themselves, including her particular friend Hermias, and
escorted her to some relatives at Catania.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 4, p. 384…. (40) that the rebellious slaves were furious at all
their masters’ household; their insolence and desire for revenge were
implacable; yet it was clear that it was not because of any natural
savagery, but because of the humiliation that they had previously had
to endure, that they went mad, and turned on those who had previously
wronged them to punish them.
…that human nature is its own teacher even among slaves when it comes to a just repayment either of favour or of revenge.
Photius, Bibliotheca,
p. 385f. (14) As I said, those who had been sent to get Damophilos and
Megallis dragged them into the city and brought them to the theatre,
where the mass of insurgents had gathered together. Damophilos made an
attempt to trick them into keeping him safe and was winning over many
of the crowd with what he was saying. Hermias and Zeuxis hated him
bitterly; they called him a deceiver, and instead of waiting for the
formality of conviction by the People, one of them pushed a sword into
his chest, the other struck his neck with an axe. Next, Eunous was
elected king. This was not because he was particularly courageous or
able as a commander, but simply because of his wonderworking and
because he had started the revolt off, and also because his name seemed
to symbolise that he would be well disposed towards those who would be
subject to him.
Photius, Bibliotheca, p. 386…. (24) that the rebel King Eunous called himself Antiokhos and the mass of the rebels Syrians…
…(15)
Established as lord of the rebels in all matters, he summoned an
assembly and killed off the people from Enna who had been captured,
except for those who were skilled at making weapons; he forced these to
carry out their work in chains. He gave Megallis to the female slaves
to treat as they saw fit; they tortured her and threw her over a cliff.
He personally killed his master and mistress, Antigenes and Python.
(16) He put on a diadem and decked himself out as a king in every other
respect, proclaimed the woman who was living with him, who came from
the same city as he in Syria, as his Queen, and made those men who
seemed to be particularly intelligent his councillors: one of them, a
man who was exceptional both in planning and in action, was a man of
Achaean origin who was also called Akhaios.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 4, p. 384…. (42) that King Antiokhos’ advisor Akhaios wasn’t
pleased at the things the slaves had done and criticised the adventures
they had dared to undertake and told them very boldly that they would
swiftly be punished. Instead of having him executed for speaking so
freely, Eunous gave him his master’s house as a present and made him
his advisor as well.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 2 (1), p. 305…. (43) that there was also another insurrection
by runaway slaves who concentrated in considerable numbers. There was a
Cilician from the area of the Taurus mountains called Kleon, who was
used to living as a bandit from childhood and had become a herder of
horses in Sicily, but continued to commit highway robbery and murder of
every kind. When he heard about Eunous’ progress and the successes of
the slaves with him, he revolted, persuaded some nearby slaves to share
his madness and overran the city of Akragas and the countryside round
about. Photius, Bibliotheca, p. 386. (17) Everyone had high hopes that
the rival groups of slaves would start fighting amongst themselves so
that by destroying each other the rebels would rid Sicily of the
revolt. But they unexpectedly combined; at a bare word from Eunous,
Kleon placed himself under his command and behaved towards him as a
general would towards his king. He had a personal following of about
five thousand soldiers. This happened about thirty days after the
insurrection.
(18) Soon after, the rebels fought against Lucius
Hypsaeus, who had been sent out from Rome as governor and had eight
thousand soldiers from Sicily itself. They had twenty thousand troops,
and were victorious. In a short time they managed to concentrate a
force of up to two hundred thousand, and they were successful in many
battles against the Romans and were rarely beaten. (19) When news of
this got around, a conspiracy of a hundred and fifty slaves was hatched
at Rome, one of over a thousand in Attica, and others at Delos and in
many other places. But in each place the authorities of the local
communities quickly suppressed the insurrection by acting swiftly and
inflicting harsh punishments; so they restrained anybody who was on the
point of revolting. But in Sicily the situation continued to
deteriorate.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 4, pp. 384f. (46) Eunous stationed his forces out of range of
their missiles and directed insults at the Romans— it was not they, he
pointed out, but the Romans who were runaways: runaways from danger.
From some distance away, he put on a show of mimes for those in the
city, in which the slaves performed the story of how they had revolted
from their own particular masters, reproaching them for the arrogance
and inordinate pride which was now leading them to their destruction….
(48) When the people of Sicily suffered from many serious difficulties,
the citizen masses not only failed to sympathise with them, but on the
contrary rejoiced because they were jealous at inequalities of wealth
and differences in lifestyle. Their jealousy turned from the dumb grief
it had previously been into open joy when they saw how the good fortune
[of the wealthy] had been changed into a condition which would
previously have been treated with utter contempt by the same people.
What was most terrifying was that the insurgents were intelligent
enough to think about the future and didn’t set fire to farm buildings
or destroy the equipment they contained or the harvests which had been
stored there, and didn’t touch any of the people working in
agriculture; but the free masses, because of their jealousy, would go
out into the countryside on the pretext of attacking the runaways and
plunder the property there, and even burn down the farms.
Photius, Bibliotheca,
p. 386. (20) Cities and their entire populations were captured and many
armies were destroyed by the insurgents, until the Roman governor
Rupilius recaptured Taormina for the Romans. He had besieged it so
effectively that conditions of unspeakable and extreme hunger had been
forced upon the insurgents—so that they began by eating their children,
then their womenfolk, and in the end they didn’t even hesitate to eat
each other.
Constantine Porphyrogenitus,
Excerpt 4, p. 387…. (Ch. 9.1) There was no respite from their pains for
those who ate the sacred fish. For the spirit world ensured that all
those who had been so stupid received no help—as though as a convenient
example to everyone else. These people have suffered criticism by
historians equal to the punishment they received from the gods, and
thus obtained the reputation they deserved.
Photius, Bibliotheca,
p, 386. (20) This was the occasion when he captured Kleon’s brother
Komanos as he was trying to flee from the besieged city. (21) In the
end the Syrian Serapion betrayed the citadel and the governor was able
to bring under his control all the runaways in the city. He tortured
them and then threw them over a cliff. From there he went on to Enna,
which he besieged in the same way; he forced the rebels to see that
their hopes had come to a dead end. Their commander Kleon came out of
the city and fought heroically with a few men until the Romans were
able to display his corpse covered with wounds. This city too they
captured through treachery, since it couldn’t be taken by even the most
powerful army. (22) Eunous took his bodyguard of a thousand men and
fled in a cowardly fashion to a region where there were lots of cliffs.
But the men with him realised that they could not avoid their fate,
since the governor Rupilius [MS: Routilios] was already driving towards
them, and they beheaded each other with their swords. The wonder-worker
Eunous, the king who had fled through cowardice, was dragged out from
the caves where he was hiding with four attendants—a cook, a baker, the
man who massaged him in the bath and a fourth who used to entertain him
when he was drinking. (23) He was put under guard; his body was eaten
up by a mass of lice, and he ended his days at Morgantine in a manner
appropriate to his villainy. Afterwards, Rupilius [MS: Routilios]
marched across the whole of Sicily with a few selected soldiers and
freed it from every trace of brigandage sooner than anyone expected.
Source: Thomas Wiedeman, Greek and Roman Slavery, London: Croom Helm, Ltd., 1981.