Documents on the Luddites



Luddism was a resistance movement mounted by skilled textiles workers in the English midlands and north between 1811-1816. The Luddites, so-called after the possibly legendary folk hero and machine breaker Ned Ludd whose name they frequently used, were not afraid of machines or technological progress as they have often been portrayed, and indeed many of them were accustomed to using machinery in their labor. The stockingers, wool croppers, and cotton weavers engaged in this rebellion did not object to technology itself, but rather to the way in which employers of their era were using new machines to produce low quality goods, suppress their wages, degrade their working conditions and to replace them with unskilled workers on the cheap. Forbidden from forming trade unions and other forms of more peaceful protests  by the Combination Acts of 1799, the Luddites engaged in attacks of industrial sabotage, breaking machines and attacking factories in order to make their views known. The Luddite rebellion was gradually crushed by the British Army at the behest of a Parliament which had allied itself with the capitalist class, but not before they had left an indelible mark on the history of the modern world.


"The machines, or frames ... are not broken for being upon any new construction ... but in consequence of goods being wrought upon them which are of little worth, are deceptive to the eye, or disreputable to the trade, and therefore pregnant with the seeds of its destruction." The Nottingham Review, 6 December, 1811


[A letter to Mr. George Smith, a resident of Huddersfield and prominent user of the new frames (Feb/Mar 1812)]:
Sir,

Information has just been given in that you are a holder of those detestable Shearing Frames, and I was desired by my men to write to you and give you fair warning to pull them down, and for that purpose I desire that you wil understand I am now writing to you.  You will take notice that if they are not taken down by the end of next week I shall attach one of my Lieutenants with at least 300 men to destroy them, and furthermore take notice that if you give us the trouble of coming so far we will increase your misfortunes by burning your Buildings down to ashes, and if you have the impudence to fire at any of my Men they have orders to Murder you and burn all your Housing....

By the General of the Army of Redressers,
Ned Ludd, Clerk

[To] all Croppers, Weavers &c & Public at large:
Generous Countrymen.  You are rquested to come forward with Arms and help the Redressers to redress their Wrongs and shake off the hateful Yoke of a Silly Old Man and his Son even more silly and their Rogueish Ministers, all Nobles and Tyrants must be brought down.  Come let us follow the Noble Example of the brave Citizens of Paris who in sight of 30,000 Tyrant Redcoats brought A Tyrant to the Ground.  By so doing you will be best aiming at your own Interest.  Above 40,000 Heroes are ready to break out, to crush the old Goverment and establish a new one.

Apply to General Ludd Commander of the Army of Redressers.
[19 April 1812]:
In justice to humanity We think it our Bounin Duty to give you this Notice that is if you do Not Cause those Dressing Machines to be Remov'd Within the Bounds of Seven Days ... your factory and all that it Contains Will and shall Surely Be Set on fire ... it is Not our Desire to Do you the Least Injury But We are fully Determin'd to Destroy Both Dressing Machines and Steam Looms Let Who Will be the Owners....

General Justice.
The Luddite Oath
I of my own free will and A Coard declare and solemly sware that I will never reveal to aney ... Person or Persons aney thing that may lead to discovery of the same Either in or by word sign or action as may lead to aney Discovery under the Penelty of being sent out of this World by the first Brother that May Meet me further more I do sware that I will Punish by death aney trater or trators should there aney arise up amongst us I will persue with unseaceing vengeance, should he fly to the verge of Statude.*  I will be gust true sober and faithful in all my deailings with all my Brothers So help GOD to keep this my Oath Invoilated Amen.
[*"Statude" may be a corruption of "Nature" which appeared in one written version of the original oath.  The Luddite Rebellion by Brian Bailey, p. 83.]
THE KING
against
George Mellor,
William Thorpe,
and Thomas Smith
Wednesday, 6th January 1813.

THE JURY were charged with the Prisoners in the usual form, upon an Indictment, which alleged that the Prisoner Mellor, on the 28th of April last, fired a pistol loaded with bullets, &c. at William Horsfall, by which firing he received a mortal wound on the left side of the belly, of which wound he languished till the 30th of April and then died; and that the Prisoners Thorpe and Smith, were present aiding and abetting Mellor to commit the said Felony; and that so the three Prisoners wilfully murdered the said William Horsfall....

The Jury retired at half past seven, and returned at five minutes before eight, finding
 
George Mellor - - - - Guilty.
William Thorpe - - - - Guilty.
Thomas Smith - - - - Guilty.
The prisoners being severally asked in the usual manner, by the Clerk of Arraigns, if they had any thing to say, why sentence of Death should not be pronounced upon them? answered,

Mellor--I have nothing to say, only I am not guilty.
Thorpe--I am not guilty, Sir; evidence has been given false against me; that I declare.
Smith--Not guilty, Sir.

Mr. Justice LE BLANC immediately passed sentence of Death upon them, in the following words:

"You, the several prisoners at the bar, have been tried and convicted of wilful and deliberate Murder; under all circumstances an offence of the deepest malignity, but under the circumstances which have appeared in this case in particular, as far as one crime of the same denomination can be distinguished from another, this may be pronounced a crime of the blackest dye.  In other cases, the Court has been able to discover something which might work upon the passions of mankind, and might induce them to commit an act, at which, in their cooler moments, their minds would have revolted.  But, in the present case, the crime was committed against a man, who appears to have given no offence to any one of you, expect that he was suspected of having expressed himself with a manly feeling against those who had set up a right to violate all property, and to take away the life of any man who had been supposed to encourage others to do, (what I trust there are still men sufficient in this country to do) to stand manfully forward in defence of their property.  For that reason, he was marked out by you as an object of the most cowardly revenge.  You, attempting to associate with yourselves such men as you could prevail upon to join in your wicked purposes, way-lay him at the moment when he is returning home, almost in mid-day, with a boldness which one has scarcely ever witnessed in trying offences of this description.  But in the course of your trial, proceedings have become before the Court, at which human nature shudders.  That the national character should be so debased; that men, who ought to boast of their character as Britons, should have dared to hold forth, in the language in which you have held forth, and with so little discretion, that assassination and destruction of property were instruments in your hands, to be exercised at your pleasure, and against any person who had happened to offend you--independently of this, that you should have dared to take into your hands the Holy Scriptures, and to administer an impious oath to those who were cognizant of your offence, calling the Almighty as a witness (that Being whom you were conscious you had offended in the highest degree,) calling upon Him for vengeance upon the heads of those who should discover your crimes--these are circumstances which have appeared in the course of this trial and which have scarcely ever appeared in the course of any trial which has been brought before a court of justice.

"It is not upon the testimony of one, or of two, or of three witnesses, that your guilt depends; and let me advise you not to lay that balm to your souls, that you have been deprived by false accusation, and by false oaths, of your lives.  A chain of circumstances has been discovered in the course of this trial, which does not depend upon the oath of any one, or two or three men, whom you may denominate even as bad as yourselves.  But even from the testimony of those, who, if they had not been honest to a certain degree, would have given a different evidence, it is clear that two at least of you were guilty; and as little doubt remains, from other evidence upon the guilt of the third of you.

"In the shop where you have worked, some of you appear to have gained such an ascendance over the minds and over the consciences of the workmen, who were in some degree under your control, that you could mould and fashion them to any wicked purpose you yourselves might imagine.  Their eyes, I hope, will be opened by the fate which awaits you; they will see, that though for a short time the career of the wicked may continue, yet the law is sure at length to overtake them.

"To you, the unfortunate persons who stand at the bar, (for every man who has disgraced his character as you have, must be deemed unfortunate) to you the only kindness I can offer, is in the advice to prepare, as speedily as you can, for that execution of this sentence, which must shortly await you; to make the best use you can of the period still allotted to you in this world--longer far than was allowed to the unfortunate person who was the object of your revenge; that you will take the opportunity of making your peace with that Almighty Being whom you have offended; that by the sincerity of your repentance, the fulness of your confession, and the acknowledgment of your offences, you may endeavour to obtain that forgiveness in the world to come, which I cannot hold out to you any hopes of obtaining in this world.

"It remains only for me to pass upon you the sentence of the law.  That sentence is, That you, the three prisoners at the bar, be taken from hence to the place from whence you came, and from thence, on Friday next, to the place of execution; that you be there severally hanged by the neck until you are dead, and your bodies afterwards delivered to the surgeons to be dissected and anatomized, according to the directions of the statue.  And may God have mercy upon your souls."
The Leeds Mercury

The Execution of these unhappy men took place yesterday, at nine o'clock, at the usual place behind the Castle wall, every precaution had been taken to make a rescue impracticable.  Two troops of Cavalry were drawn up at the front of the drop and the entrances to the Castle were guarded by Infantry.  At five minutes before nine o'clock, the prisoners were upon the fatal platform.  After the ordinary had read the accustomed forms of prayer on these occasions, George Mellor prayed for about ten minutes; he spoke with great apparent fervency and devotion, confessing in general. the greatness of his sins, but without any admission to the crime for which he suffered.  He prayed earnestly for mercy, and with a pathos that was affecting.  The surrounding multitude were evidently affected.  William Thorpe also prayed, but his voice was not so well heard.  Smith said little, but seemed to join in the devotion with great seriousness.  The prisoners were then moved to the front of the platform, and Mellor said:  "Some of my enemies may be here, if there be, I freely forgive them, and all the world, and I hope the world will forgive me."  William Thorpe said, "I hope none of those who are now before me, will ever come to this place."  The executioner then proceeded to perform his fatal office, and the drop fell.  Some alteration had been made to the drop, so that all the whole body was visible when they were suspended; in former executions only the feet and head could be seen by the spectators.  They were executed in their irons.  They appeared slightly convulsed for a few moments.
REFLECTIONS ON LUDDISM.
George Beaumont, 1813

IT will, no doubt, be gratifying to some Readers, to be made acquainted with the origin of Luddism.  From the enquiries I made in Nottinghamshire, where Luddism originated, I learnt the following particulars, namely, That a good many years ago, there lived a poor man at Longborough, in Leicestershire, about fifteen miles from Nottingham, whose name was Edward Ludd:  this man was not one of the brightest cast, in regard to his intellects; and, as is commonly the case with such characters, was of an irritable temper.  This Edward Ludd, called by his neighbours Ned Ludd, was by trade a Frame Work Knitter:  or in plainer language, and which is all the same, a Stocking Weaver.  This man, being irritated, either by his Employer, or his work, or both, took the desperate resolution of avenging himself, by breaking his Stocking Frame.  As the value of a common Stocking Frame is considerable, being not much less than Forty Pounds, Ned's exploit was much more admired for its temerity than its utility.

However, the consequence of this affair was, a Bon Mot:  for, whenever any Stocking Weaver was out of patience with his Employer or his Employment, he would say, speaking of his Frame, "I have a good mind to Ned Ludd it:" meaning, I have a good mind to break it, &c.

About the latter end of the year 1811, the Stocking and Lace Weavers of Nottingham, having been for a long time harrassed by abridged wages, and want of employment, in whole or in part, and consequently with want of bread, entered into a combination, (as report says, upon oath) to break certain proscribed Frames.  But it should here be observed, that the interdicted Frames were not all of a new-invented kind, there being many destined to destruction for the sake of their owner; the owner having rendered himself notorious by abridging the workmen's wages, and underselling other manufacturers:  therefore many Frames of an ordinary construction were broken.

These Frame-Breakers assumed the name of their proto-type Ned Ludd.  Hence when they entered a house in order to break Frames, they would say Ned Ludd or General Ludd, commands us to break these Frames, &c.  These men, collectively, were therefore called Luddites, and their system was, and is, called Luddism.

This system has been communicated to thousands; and as rumour says, to hundreds of thousands, and is still in existence.  But it does not always exist where report places it; for every thief and highwayman now takes the name of Ned Ludd in his mouth when he is about to commit his depredations; and News Printers seem very willing to have it so; most of them caring very little about the difference betwixt truth and falsehood; their drift too commonly is, to enhance the value of their Papers, by saying something that will surprise and astonish their readers.  The old and stale names of thief, highwayman, and robber, will not now adorn the great news columns of those Papers which are ever seeking to treat their Readers with a mess of Wonderment!  Therefore Ned Ludd being a new character, is made to bear the heat and burden of the day; for whatever enormities are committed in the counties where Ned lives, they are, for the most part, very carefully ascribed to him.

Of the fourteen unfortunate men who were executed at York, on the 15th Jan. 1813, not one-half of them, as I am informed, were in reality Luddites.  Either five or six of them were Luddites, who were convicted of entering houses and demanding fire-arms, or breaking, or attempting to break machinery' part of them upon one charge, and part of them upon the other.  As to the rest of the fourteen, they were, as I am informed, utter strangers to the system of Luddism:  but knowing something of Luddism by popular rumour, they had designated themselves Luddites.  Wherefore on entering a house they would preface their demand of money, by telling the people General Ludd was come:  or that Ned Ludd had sent them to make such and such a demand.  Information of the transaction soon reached the ears of a News Printer:  who, glad enough of something fresh to tell his Readers, soon laid it before the public:  his fellow Newsmen would copy his statement, and thus this wonderful news which was half true and half false, ran, in the compass of a week, all over the three kingdoms.

With regard to the conduct of the Luddites in breaking Machinery, I wholly disapprove of it:  it is altogether condemnable:  for in my opinion, Machinery ought to be encouraged to any extent whatever.  It is also my opinion, that every man that invents any thing that will lessen human labour, is a benefactor to mankind, and ought to be rewarded, not by a patent, as is commonly the case, but out of the national purse, in order that he an others may be encouraged to new exertions, and the public benefitted by the free use of such inventions!

I pity the poor, and should hardly think myself innocent if any man felt more for them than I do; but the remedy for their grievances, lies not in the destruction of machinery.  They are oppressed exceedingly, but not by Machinery.  Those who accuse Machinery of causing any part of the distresses of the poor, have very contracted views and narrow minds, and see but a little way.  They do not seem to consider that almost every thing was new Machinery once.  There was a time when corn was ground by the hand; and when Corn Mills and Wind Mills were first invented they were New Machinery; and therefore why not break and burn these as soon as any other kind of Machinery; for if they were all stopped, and corn again ground by the hand, there would be plenty of employment for many hands!  Much the same observations might be made respecting every other kind of Machinery, and I have asked this question in order to shew the silliness of the practice....

With regard to labourers and mechanics, and poor men in general, their case is evidently very deplorable; but I think it is much worse in reality than in appearance....

About two years ago, the Cotton Weavers of Manchester, and its vicinity, having long had their wages abridged in an extreme degree, were reduced by excessive labour, and half maintainance, nearly to skeletons.  They were also become ragged and forlorn:  and those who had wives and children, as many of them had, had the mortification to see these natural dependents as ghastly and wretched as themselves.  Even single men, in general, found it impossible by all their exertions, to procure for themselves a sufficiency of the necessaries of life.  The patience of the Weavers under these severe privations, was worthy of admiration.  Disinclination to turbulence, and expectation of better times, induced many to hold their patience until they lost their lives, and when they had done, but few rich people cared a straw for them....

Here then, reader, a brief recapitulation will give thee a distinct view of this grievous business:--In the first place, the Weavers were long impoverished by abridged Wages, even until their existence became a burthen--they then took the prudent measure of sending Delegates to represent their condition to Government, and to implore redress; and this they did more than once:  but this mode was ineffectual, as the Masters failed not to counteract their efforts, either openly or secretly.  They then called upon the Masters to meet them and enter into fair discussion on the subject; they also called upon the Magistrates to join both parties, and act as Mediators in the business:  but the Masters would never enter honestly and unanimously into conditions with those whom habit and commercial policy had taught them to keep at a distance; and the Magistrates, being more nearly allied to the Masters by rank and fortune, and also more familiar with them by convivial interview, dealt in the business with but a slack hand.  It may be added, likewise, that some of the Magistrates had been Masters themselves:  and to all the rest it must be super-added, that there is no existing law against the practice of abridging Wages!

The Weavers seeing no prospect of any help from others, began now to think of helping themselves.  They accordingly began to assemble in large bodies in the open air, and in the day time.  They adopted strong measures;  one of which was to work no more at all until their Wages should be augmented.  They also spoiled the Work of those Weavers who entered not into their combination.  They were then seized by Dragoons and Constables, and sent in groups to prison; besides being loaded with foul epithets, and disgraceful names, such as litigious fellows, movers of sedition, mischief makers, disturbers of the public peace, &c. for it is not the way of wealth and power in modern times, to redress grievances and remove oppressions; but rather to stifle complaints, and suppress remonstrances by Dragoons, Prisons, Gibbets, and and [sic] Foul Names!  And to complete the miseries of the miserable, the News Printers generally echo the language of authority, seldom or never having the manly fortitude to state to the public what they really believe respecting the actual condition of the poor....

The poor Mechanics of Nottinghamshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Derbyshire, Yorkshire, and else where, finding themselves hemmed in by multiplied oppressions of long duration, such as, War with all its attendant evils; Provisions high; Taxes high; Wages low; frequently work scarce; Law and Power nearly all on the side of the oppressors; no Public Writers to state the case of the Poor, in a just and impartial manner; News Printers, for the most part, either Knaves or Cowards, who had courage enough to libel and defame the Oppressed, but not virtue sufficient to defend them.

What then reader, was the consequence of all this?  Why, LUDDISM!  Here then, is as plain a statement of the origin of Luddism, as I am capable, with my present information, of drawing.  I am not able to say from certain information that I have a personal acquaintance with any Luddite in the world.  My knowledge of the business has been picked up in an indirect way, and partly from the Newspapers.

When the Luddites began first to break Machinery, the News Printers, and especially those of London, abused them in the most unqualified language, calling them infatuated men; deluded men; wicked men; and ill-designing men.  But I did not observe that any of these "infatuated" Printers had the candour to call the Poor Luddites empty-bellied men--ragged men--or worn-out, emaciated, half-starved, dying men!  A few words of this kind might have been slipped in without any injury to the truth:  though indeed it might have been greatly detrimental to the interest of those who derive a considerable revenue from the sale of truth and conscience, and who make their fortunes by deceiving and poisoning the public mind, and who are principals in bringing on national ruin; and who, strange to tell, are paid for their villainy out of the hard earnings of those whom they ruin!!!

I wholly disapprove of the conduct of the Luddites, as I have already stated, in their breaking Machinery:  they ought in no wise to injure either persons or property, but then their real grievances are not to be denied and disregarded, because they are poor and imprudent.  For if they be mad it is oppression that has made them mad....
"The Hand-loom Weavers' Lament"
You gentlemen and tradesmen, that ride about at will,
Look down on these poor people; it's enough to make you crill;
Look down on these poor people, as you ride up and down,
I think there is a God above will bring your pride quite down.

Chorus:
You tyrants of England, your race may soon be run,
You may be brought unto account for what you've sorely done.

You pull down our wages, shamefully to tell;
You go into the markets, and say you cannot sell;
And when that we do ask you when these bad times will mend,
You quickly give an answer, "When the wars are at an end."

When we look on our poor children, it grieves our hearts full sore,
Their clothing it is worn to rags, while we can get no more,
With little in their bellies, they to work must go,
Whilst yours do dress as manky as monkeys in a show.

You go to church on Sundays, I'm sure it's nought but pride,
There can be no religion where humanity's thrown aside;
If there be a place in heaven, as there is in the Exchange,
Our poor souls must not come near there; like lost sheep they must range.

With the choicest of strong dainties your tables overspread,
With good ale and strong brandy, to make your faces red;
You call'd a set of visitors--it is your whole delight--
And you lay your heads together to make our faces white.

You say that Bonyparty he's been the spoil of all,
And that we have got reason to pray for his downfall;
Now Bonyparty's dead and gone, and it is plainly shown
That we have bigger tyrants in Boneys of our own.

And now, my lads, for to conclude, it's time to make an end;
Let's see if we can form a plan that these bad times may mend;
Then give us our old prices, as we have had before,
And we can live in happiness, and rub off the old score.
http://faculty.humanities.uci.edu/bjbecker/SpinningWeb/week8d.html